From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 17:47:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: move read_{boot, persistent}_clock to the
 architecture level
In-Reply-To: <1335617145-24649-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
References: <1335617145-24649-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20120505164753.GP897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:45:45PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> At the moment, read_persistent_clock is implemented at the
> platform level, which makes it impossible to compile these
> platforms in a single kernel.
> 
> Implement these two functions at the architecture level, and
> provide a thin registration interface for both read_boot_clock
> and read_persistent_clock. The two affected platforms (OMAP and
> Tegra) are converted at the same time.
> 
> Compile tested only.

As this now has tested-bys for OMAP and Tegra, I guess it's ready.  Who's
planning to take this?