From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 18:20:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: move read_{boot, persistent}_clock to the architecture level In-Reply-To: References: <1335617145-24649-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20120505164753.GP897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20120505172029.GR897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 07:16:50PM +0200, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Sat, 5 May 2012 17:47:53 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:45:45PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> At the moment, read_persistent_clock is implemented at the > >> platform level, which makes it impossible to compile these > >> platforms in a single kernel. > >> > >> Implement these two functions at the architecture level, and > >> provide a thin registration interface for both read_boot_clock > >> and read_persistent_clock. The two affected platforms (OMAP and > >> Tegra) are converted at the same time. > >> > >> Compile tested only. > > > > As this now has tested-bys for OMAP and Tegra, I guess it's ready. > Who's > > planning to take this? > > If you're happy to take it, and unless someone objects to it, I'll put it > in the patch system. Sure.