From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:10:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: irq: Increase no of supported interrupts to 128 In-Reply-To: <87d36bvh9a.fsf@ti.com> References: <1336486679-15892-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> <87lil2o6u1.fsf@ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA1C06F@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <87d36bvh9a.fsf@ti.com> Message-ID: <20120510221012.GP21851@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Kevin Hilman [120510 14:53]: > "Hiremath, Vaibhav" writes: > > > > Let me finish up with am33xx baseport upstream activity which is currently > > going on at full swing, then next thing I will pick up is this code cleanup. > > > > I still feel, this is still a valid cleanup patch, and can be merged, as it > > is required/used when we do major cleanup. > > Well, Tony can make that decision. > > Personally, I think this patch continues to add confusion on top of an > existing mess, and to me provides the proverbial straw that broke the > camel's back. > > That being said, the INTC core is an obviously important and sensitive > piece of code so needs to be handled with care. > > In case Tony decides to merge this patch and allow a future** cleanup, > I'll provide some comments. Heh I agree with Kevin here :) Tony > ** since they rarely happen, we tend to not have too much faith in > promises of mythical "future" cleanups. This is not because we don't > trust you personally, but simply based on based experience.