From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 20:45:15 +0200 Subject: Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change In-Reply-To: <4FA31297.8000904@wwwdotorg.org> References: <4FA31297.8000904@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120512184515.GC28973@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, > Is your i2c-embedded/for-next branch stable (i.e. that commit will not > be rebased between now and when you send a pull request for 3.5), so I > can use it as a baseline for a Tegra branch? If not, could you let me > know when it is stable, so I can create the Tegra branch as that time. Because of my holidays coming along, I'd think my for-next branch is done now (except for additions maybe). Yet, when and how to rewind the branch and/or offering a stable base in general is another thing I need to scratch my head about afterwards. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: