linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: Samsung: Update the device names for spi clock lookup
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 15:51:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120513145134.GA6381@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuYYwSTJoNRuN87GoTZMgF-qahbu02kJ9SUd7omQ5WD0VjTww@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:17:32AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 22:28, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:

> > This means that bisection will be broken - anything with only one tree
> > won't be able to load the SPI driver successfully until it's merged
> > with the other which isn't ideal.

> Yes, we would have that problem until the two trees are merged. But I
> still prefer not to squash the two patches which already contain huge
> diff.

I'd not say the diff is *that* big (and most of what's there is simple
and repetitive), and bisection is a very useful tool.  I know I
frequently find it enormously painful trying to figure out breakage when
large chunks of the history don't work usefully.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120513/7c1c81cf/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-13 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-08 22:04 [PATCH 00/10] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree Thomas Abraham
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 01/10] spi: s3c64xx: remove unused S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TRLCNTZ macro Thomas Abraham
2012-05-20  4:41   ` Grant Likely
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 02/10] spi: s3c64xx: move controller information into driver data Thomas Abraham
2012-05-20  4:42   ` Grant Likely
2012-05-30  7:23   ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-30  8:00     ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] ARM: Samsung: Remove spi hardware controller information from platform data Thomas Abraham
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] ARM: Samsung: Remove pdev pointer paremeter from spi gpio setup functions Thomas Abraham
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] ARM: Samsung: Update the device names for spi clock lookup Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09  8:52   ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09 13:40     ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09 14:28       ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09 17:17         ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-13 14:51           ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-05-20  4:43             ` Grant Likely
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] ARM: Samsung: Modify s3c64xx_spi{0|1|2}_set_platdata function Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09  8:56   ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09  9:10     ` Heiko Stübner
2012-05-09 10:55       ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09 14:22         ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09 14:33           ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09 15:06             ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] spi: s3c64xx: Remove the 'set_level' callback from controller data Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09  8:03   ` Jassi Brar
2012-05-09  9:20   ` Heiko Stübner
2012-05-09 10:31     ` Jassi Brar
2012-05-20  4:45   ` Grant Likely
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] ARM: Exynos4: Fix the incorrect hierarchy of spi controller bus clock Thomas Abraham
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] ARM: Exynos5: Add spi clock support Thomas Abraham
2012-05-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] spi: s3c64xx: add device tree support Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09  9:07   ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09 14:13     ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09 14:32       ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09 16:39         ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09 16:47           ` Mark Brown
2012-05-09 17:19             ` Thomas Abraham
2012-05-09  8:17 ` [PATCH 00/10] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree Jassi Brar
2012-05-22 12:35 ` padma venkat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120513145134.GA6381@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).