From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:09:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: integrator: fix typo in PCI swizzle function
In-Reply-To: <CAP=VYLrTRQn_MQdB6mVC5qpPB1f6W8Maw8gaPN2TPRDy9c5Nvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1336813546-25766-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
 <CAP=VYLrTRQn_MQdB6mVC5qpPB1f6W8Maw8gaPN2TPRDy9c5Nvw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120513160925.GA13947@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:04:40PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > The next tree didn't compile due to a typo in commit
> > cfb32a689949d09f112493de4a1e3e5900db2053
> > "ARM: PCI: integrator: use common PCI swizzle"
> 
> While the above commit may have played a role, it wasn't the
> one that actually caused the final build fail.  I bisected to the
> failing commit and sent the same fix for this over a week ago.
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg172951.html
> 
> Should I also be Cc'ing arm at kernel.org on all prospective
> ARM fixes I find in linux-next in the future?

Take a moment to have a think about whether arm-soc can fix a change
that's in my tree...