From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 12:41:49 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 10/20] of/irq: fix interrupt parent lookup procedure In-Reply-To: <07f801cd3274$cfbe4200$6f3ac600$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1335813270-13083-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <1335813270-13083-11-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <07f801cd3274$cfbe4200$6f3ac600$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20120515184149.4E6B93E080A@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 15 May 2012 17:29:14 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Thomas Abraham wrote: > > > > The interrupt parent lookup fails for a node that is a interrupt-controller > > but does not have an explict interrupt-parent property and instead inherits > > this property from the root node. > > > > Consider the nodes listed below. > > > > / { > > interrupt-parent = <&intc_level1>; > > > > intc_level1: interrupt-controller at xxx { > > interrupt-controller; > > #interrupt-cells = <3>; > > ; > > }; > > > > intc_level2: interrupt-controller at yyy { > > interrupt-controller; > > #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > ; > > }; > > }; > > > > The interrupt parent lookup for interrupt-controller at yyy fails. It inherits > > the interrupt-parent property from the root node and the root node ('/') > > specifies a 'interrupt-parent' property which represents the default interrupt > > root controller. But, the property '#interrupt-cells' might not be specified > > in the root node. > > > > In case a interrupt controller node does not include a 'interrupt-parent' > > property but inherits that property from the root node, the check for > > 'interrupt-cells' property in the root node fails. Fix this removing the > > check for 'interrupt-cells' property. Hmmm... I dont see the bug... From your description above, I see the following sequence. First iteration: child = &ic at yyy; cannot find "interrupt-parent" so take 'if' clause p = of_get_parent(child); (root) iteration continues because #interrupt-cells not found in 'p'(root) Second iteration: child = root; found "interrupt-parent", so take 'else' clause p = of_find_node_by_phandle(); (ic at xxx) iteration stops because #interrupt-cells is found in 'p'(ic at xxx) What am I missing in my admittedly short look at the code? g. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham > > --- > > drivers/of/irq.c | 4 +++- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c > > index 9cf0060..a520363 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/irq.c > > +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c > > @@ -66,14 +66,16 @@ struct device_node *of_irq_find_parent(struct device_node *child) > > if (parp == NULL) > > p = of_get_parent(child); > > else { > > + of_node_put(child); > > if (of_irq_workarounds & OF_IMAP_NO_PHANDLE) > > p = of_node_get(of_irq_dflt_pic); > > else > > p = of_find_node_by_phandle(be32_to_cpup(parp)); > > + return p; > > } > > of_node_put(child); > > child = p; > > - } while (p && of_get_property(p, "#interrupt-cells", NULL) == NULL); > > + } while (p); This does break one use-case. Sometimes the interrupt-parent is the same node when an > > > > return p; > > } > > -- > > 1.7.5.4 > > Hi Grant and Rob, > > I'm ok on this and this patch and #11 patch in this series are required for patches that add device tree based support for wakeup > interrupts on EXYNOS5250. > > So could you have a look at this patch and let us know if this is okay or any rework is required. > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.