From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:56:43 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL][for 3.5] pull request of board-specific branch in arch-pxa git tree In-Reply-To: <201205151140.07655.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1337074321.33676.YahooMailClassic@web29011.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <201205151140.07655.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20120518095643.GG12015@sortiz-mobl> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, Paul, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:40:07AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Paul Parsons wrote: > > --- On Tue, 15/5/12, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > Did you miss a dependency? Should I revert that patch for > > > now? > > > > hx4700.c expects to find the clock_rate field in the > > asic3_platform_data structure. > > > > The clock_rate field is due to be added in V3.5: > > > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1204.2/00339.html > > > > This is not good, you should not split patches in a way that breaks > the individual pieces. It would have been better to just take the entire > patch through either arm-soc or the mfd tree. > > Any suggestions for a way out of this mess? I'm inclined to just > revert the patch I have and let Samuel pick it up to submit it along > with the other half. That sounds reasonable. However, it's too late now for a 3.5 inclusion, so I'll queue it to my for-next branch. Paul, could you please re-send this patch to me ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/