From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] plat-versatile: modernize FPGA IRQ controller
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:49:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120519054948.B978B3E046E@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F9714BD.4060103@gmail.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:01:49 -0500, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/17/2012 02:24 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > This does two things to the FPGA IRQ controller in the versatile
> > family:
> >
> > - Convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER so we can drop the entry macro
> > from the Integrator. The C IRQ handler was inspired from
> > arch/arm/common/vic.c, recent bug discovered in this handler was
> > accounted for.
> > - Convert to using IRQ domains so we can get rid of the NO_IRQ
> > mess and proceed with device tree and such stuff.
> >
> > As part of the exercise, bump all the low IRQ numbers on the
> > Integrator PIC to start from 1 rather than 0, since IRQ 0 is
> > now NO_IRQ. The Linux IRQ numbers are thus entirely decoupled
> > from the hardware IRQ numbers in this controller.
> >
> > I was unable to split this patch. The main reason is the half-done
> > conversion to device tree in Versatile.
> >
> > Tested on Integrator/AP and Integrator/CP.
> >
> > Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> Looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Ditto.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-19 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 19:24 [PATCH v4] plat-versatile: modernize FPGA IRQ controller Linus Walleij
2012-04-24 21:01 ` Rob Herring
2012-05-19 5:49 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120519054948.B978B3E046E@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox