From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: kirkwood, nand, clocks and device-tree
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 11:51:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120520095110.GC12741@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fwaxes25.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org>
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:50:42AM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to convert iconnect to use the new nand DT support on kirkwood
> but my system was freezing hard during boot. So, I've debugged it a
> little bit and have several questions.
>
> The first one is about were is defined the nand. It's defined as a leaf
> of the "ocp" bus. I would have expected to see it at the same level but
> I've seen nothing proving if it's wrong or right when comparing with
> hardware. Can anyone give me some information about that ?
>
> Now, the real questions about my problem. It's hanging because the nand
> platform device created throught DT is called f4000000.nand and not
> orion_nand. This means that the clock gets disabled by
> clk_disable_unused() so first access to the nand fails badly.
> To workaround, I've added into mach-kirkwood/common.c:
>
> + orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "f4000000.nand", runit);
Although this works, its the wrong way to do it. Jamie Lentin figured
out the right way to do this. Jamie, care to explain please...
> The bonus question is that while debugging this issue, I've disabled
> all nand declarations in kirkwood.dtsi and my localy modified
> kirkwood-iconnect.dts but I was still getting a hard freeze. I think
> that means that the "runit" clock is doing more than NAND and SPI but
> I've found no details in the 6281 manual about what's using this
> clock.
Yes, i found the same. I tried extending the SPI driver so that it
turned the clock off between transfers. Hard crash like you. I suspect
i might have to mark this clock as not to be turned off when unused.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-20 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-18 9:50 kirkwood, nand, clocks and device-tree Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2012-05-20 9:51 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2012-05-20 13:05 ` Jamie Lentin
2012-05-20 13:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-21 1:08 ` Jason Cooper
2012-05-21 5:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-21 15:57 ` Jason Cooper
2012-05-21 17:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-21 18:11 ` Jason Cooper
2012-05-22 7:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-22 12:42 ` Jason Cooper
2012-05-21 1:12 ` Jason Cooper
2012-05-21 21:55 ` [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: Force nand platform device name Jamie Lentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120520095110.GC12741@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).