From: pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Clock register in early init
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:15:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120522111532.GH8730@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJOA=zNoj1nZ+zVURfhziqFem4F7_Y_B8s=Gp1Aptr0hgfj6Xw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:05:57PM +0200, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Peter De Schrijver
> <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On OMAP I think the only "gotcha" is setting up the timer. ?One
> >> solution is to open code the register reads and the rate calculation
> >> in the timer code. ?That is ugly... but it works.
> >>
> >> > Which advantages do you see in dynamically allocating all this?
> >> >
> >>
> >> There are many but I'll name a couple. ?The most significant point is
> >> that we can avoid exposing the definition of struct clk if we
> >> dynamically allocate stuff. ?One can use struct clk_hw_init to
> >> statically initialize data, or instead rely on direct calls to
> >> clk_register with a bunch of parameters.
> >>
> >
> > Which means if you make a mistake in specifying parents for example, it will
> > only fail at runtime, possibly before any console is active. With static
> > initialization, this will fail at compiletime. Much easier to debug.
> >
>
> Is this really a problem? Once you have good data it does not change.
> Debugging bad data when introducing a new chip is just a fact of
> life. Static versus dynamic is irrelevant here.
>
I think it is a problem yes, especially when the tree becomes more
complicated.
Cheers,
Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1337227884.2066.9.camel@pgaikwad-dt2>
[not found] ` <20120517062131.GA9305@gmail.com>
2012-05-18 4:48 ` Clock register in early init Prashant Gaikwad
2012-05-18 11:21 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-18 20:17 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-21 8:46 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-21 18:05 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-22 11:15 ` Peter De Schrijver [this message]
2012-05-22 9:20 ` Ben Dooks
2012-05-22 12:08 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-22 17:37 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-23 9:19 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-23 16:20 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-24 1:02 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-24 15:51 ` Turquette, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120522111532.GH8730@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com \
--to=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).