linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Clock register in early init
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:02:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120524010237.GC11860@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJOA=zNic19Eyq-RJpj_pM94wpqY7co0dtKu1O+27B-wZMm=MA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:37:15AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Peter De Schrijver
> <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >> We had at-least that on the older Samsung parts and they where still
> >> growing. I would suggest that in a multi-kernel image situation the
> >> more data that can be discarded after init-time the better.
> >>
> >> Also, __initdata gets gathered into one place so there's no possibility
> >> of page fragmentation there. If you mean fragmentation of the memory
> >> map, then allocate the size of all the clocks you know of at init time
> >> in one go.
> >>
> >
> > That would work, except that clocks are needed before kmalloc is available.
> >
> 
> Is static initialization the only way to solve this problem?  What
> about using the bootmem allocator for early init clocks?
> 
This is what sh does for its asm/clkdev.h __clkdev_alloc(), which is
really the only difference over the ARM version. It always seemed a bit
silly to me to make early allocation an arch-specific property.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-24  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1337227884.2066.9.camel@pgaikwad-dt2>
     [not found] ` <20120517062131.GA9305@gmail.com>
2012-05-18  4:48   ` Clock register in early init Prashant Gaikwad
2012-05-18 11:21     ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-18 20:17       ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-21  8:46         ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-21 18:05           ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-22 11:15             ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-22  9:20           ` Ben Dooks
2012-05-22 12:08             ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-22 17:37               ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-23  9:19                 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-23 16:20                   ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-24  1:02                 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2012-05-24 15:51                   ` Turquette, Mike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120524010237.GC11860@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).