From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:30:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: imx6q: add clock for apbh-dma In-Reply-To: <1337856659-24812-2-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> References: <1337856659-24812-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1337856659-24812-2-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20120524173028.GD16535@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:50:56PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > add the clock for apbh-dma. > > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c > index cab02d0..12d9040 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c > @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ int __init mx6q_clocks_init(void) > clk[ahb] = imx_clk_busy_divider("ahb", "periph", base + 0x14, 10, 3, base + 0x48, 1); > > /* name parent_name reg shift */ > - clk[apbh_dma] = imx_clk_gate2("apbh_dma", "ahb", base + 0x68, 4); > + clk[apbh_dma] = imx_clk_gate2("apbh_dma", "usdhc3", base + 0x68, 4); This change looks strange. Is this correct? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |