From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:38:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect Device Tree In-Reply-To: <4FCDDFFC.3000902@linaro.org> References: <20120530100302.GD9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120530121547.GJ9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FC63632.4030504@linaro.org> <20120530151119.GN9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FC63B39.6040905@linaro.org> <20120530164152.GP9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FC846CC.20801@linaro.org> <20120601084850.GJ24139@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FCDDFFC.3000902@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120605103846.GQ23408@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:31:24AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 01/06/12 09:48, Mark Brown wrote: > >What makes you say the two are equivalent? The former is a reference > >from a consumer device to a named regulator while the latter is a > >reference from a regulator to a named consumer. > I mean they both link regulator<->consumer and apply the name "vmmc" > to the supply, or am I missing something / getting confused? You're missing something - note what I say above about the direction the mapping is done in, and consider what happens if we've got two of the same PMIC down in a system. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: