From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] Rework KERN_<LEVEL>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:28:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605142826.d92316a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1338889066.git.joe@perches.com>
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 02:46:29 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> KERN_<LEVEL> currently takes up 3 bytes.
> Shrink the kernel size by using an ASCII SOH and then the level byte.
> Remove the need for KERN_CONT.
> Convert directly embedded uses of <.> to KERN_<LEVEL>
What an epic patchset. I guess that saving a byte per printk does make
the world a better place, and forcibly ensuring that nothing is
dependent upon the internal format of the KERN_foo strings is nice.
Unfortunately the <n> thing is part of the kernel ABI:
echo "<4>foo" > /dev/kmsg
devkmsg_writev() does weird and wonderful things with
facilities/levels. That function incorrectly returns "success" when
copy_from_user() faults, btw. It also babbles on about LOG_USER and
LOG_KERN without ever defining these things. I guess they're
userspace-only concepts and are hardwired to 0 and 1 in the kernel. Or
not.
So what to do about /dev/kmsg? I'd say "nothing": we retain "<n>" as
the externally-presented kernel format for a facility level, and the
fact that the kernel internally uses a different encoding is hidden
from userspace.
And if the user does
echo "\0014foo" > /dev/kmsg
then I guess we should pass it straight through, retaining the \0014.
But from my reading of your code, this doesn't work - vprintk_emit()
will go ahead and strip and interpret the \0014, evading the stuff
which devkmsg_writev() did.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 9:46 [PATCH 0/8] Rework KERN_<LEVEL> Joe Perches
2012-06-05 9:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] arch: Remove direct definitions of KERN_<LEVEL> uses Joe Perches
2012-06-05 21:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-06-05 21:53 ` [PATCH 0/8] Rework KERN_<LEVEL> Kay Sievers
2012-06-05 22:11 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-05 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-05 22:49 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-05 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-05 23:35 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-05 23:39 ` Kay Sievers
2012-06-05 23:43 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-05 23:48 ` Kay Sievers
2012-06-05 23:52 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-05 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-06 0:07 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-06 0:13 ` Kay Sievers
2012-06-06 0:19 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-06 0:28 ` Kay Sievers
2012-06-06 0:37 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-06 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-06 0:40 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-06 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-06 1:10 ` Kay Sievers
2012-06-06 2:06 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-06 3:04 ` [PATCH 9/8] printk: Only look for prefix levels in kernel messages Joe Perches
2012-06-05 23:48 ` [PATCH 0/8] Rework KERN_<LEVEL> Joe Perches
2012-06-05 22:55 ` Kay Sievers
2012-06-05 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120605142826.d92316a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).