From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:56:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] mmc: tegra: use bus-width property instead of support-8bit In-Reply-To: <1338834755-6900-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1338834755-6900-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120606135647.GA3423@void.printf.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:32:34PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > Update the driver to parse the new unified bus-width property introduced > in commit 7f21779 "mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings", instead of the legacy > support-8bit property. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > --- > Chris, It's probably easiest conflict-wise if I take this through the Tegra > tree. (Note: When I posted this series before, I said there shouldn't be any > conflicts if you take them through the MMC tree. That's probably still true, > but unforseen future conflicts seem more likely in the .dts files in the > second patch than sdhci-tegra.c in this patch, so the Tegra tree may make > more sense). Since the second patch depends on the first, it's easiest if > these go in through the same tree. Does this sound OK? Yes, makes sense -- taking this via the Tegra tree is fine: Acked-by: Chris Ball Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child