linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Freescale fec.c driver breakage
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:36:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120607233609.GR14525@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FCF0994.4040902@snapgear.com>

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:

> Most of the older ones don't. Most of the older parts that have a FEC
> core have a single clock-in for the chip, possibly a PLL and often a
> fixed divisor for distribuion to all on-chip peripherals. I have seen it
> named various names, 'bclko', 'mclk', "fsys/2", nothing seems consistent.

> I think very generic namse might be the best solution here.

Bear in mind that the IP level names shouldn't need to correspond to the
names used in the overall system integration.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120608/04d951c6/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-07 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-04  4:42 Freescale fec.c driver breakage Greg Ungerer
2012-06-04  8:19 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-04  9:16   ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05  6:55     ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-05  9:41       ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 12:17         ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-05 12:24           ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 12:36             ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-05 12:40               ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 12:48           ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-05 13:24             ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-05 13:41               ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 14:35                 ` Steven King
2012-06-06  7:41                   ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-07 23:36                     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-06-05 13:42               ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120607233609.GR14525@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).