From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:25:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: formalize an IPI for CPU wake-ups In-Reply-To: <4FD62DBB.8070407@codeaurora.org> References: <20120611155716.GA18267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120611165115.GB18267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4FD62DBB.8070407@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20120611192519.GF18267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:41:15AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/11/12 10:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > It certainly works for all the targets I'm looking at right now. In > > those cases the boot protocol couldn't care less about the IPI number as > > the point is only to kick the target CPU out of WFI. > > > > And that message certainly has to go as it may be triggered multiple > > times per second in some use cases here. > > > > > > Last time this came up I thought we covered most of the platforms? > > OMAP, Realview, Versatile Express, and MSM are covered by this thread > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-January/039275.html Ok, in that case I've just committed three patches to make those platforms use SGI0 instead of SGI1.