From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:34:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201206270434.20558.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627021336.GA9787@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Dear Shawn Guo,
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:30:31AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Ok, I managed to replicate it just now. Scrap my previous email.
> >
> > Still, any idea what can cause this?
>
> I just spent some time on it. It looks like a document issue (dammit).
>
> The HW_I2C_TIMING2 EXAMPLE tells the value is 0x0015000d which is the
> one you looked at and used. But the register field figure tells it's
> 0x00300030, which seems the real case.
>
> The mxs_i2c_reset at probe changes the value to 0x0015000d which causes
> the first time playback nonfunctional, but the mxs_i2c_reset call in
> mxs_i2c_xfer_msg happens to reset the value back to 0x00300030, and
> then second time playback starts working.
>
> The changes below get everything work fine, both 100k and 400k. So
> with the changes in, you can add:
Ok, can you push the FSL guys to roll out updated document?
Do you consider it reasonable to add some calculations of these timing values or
were they somehow fine-tuned with a scope/deep HW knowledge as the best working
values and we should stick to those?
> Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
> --8<---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mxs.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mxs.c
> index e38be56..c2467e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mxs.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mxs.c
> @@ -112,13 +112,13 @@ struct mxs_i2c_speed_config {
> const struct mxs_i2c_speed_config mxs_i2c_95kHz_config = {
> .timing0 = 0x00780030,
> .timing1 = 0x00800030,
> - .timing2 = 0x0015000d,
> + .timing2 = 0x00300030,
> };
>
> const struct mxs_i2c_speed_config mxs_i2c_400kHz_config = {
> .timing0 = 0x000f0007,
> .timing1 = 0x001f000f,
> - .timing2 = 0x0015000d,
> + .timing2 = 0x00300030,
> };
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-27 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-09 11:45 [PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c Marek Vasut
2012-06-09 11:45 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] MXS: Implement DMA support into mxs-i2c Marek Vasut
2012-06-10 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c Marek Vasut
2012-06-11 7:30 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-11 10:53 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-11 14:42 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-23 18:19 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-11 6:39 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-11 10:54 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-27 1:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-27 2:13 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-27 2:34 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-06-23 18:47 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-25 15:43 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-25 16:02 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-27 1:15 ` Marek Vasut
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-09 16:22 Marek Vasut
2012-07-13 8:07 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201206270434.20558.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).