From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:18:20 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCHv1 1/2] ARM: socfpga: initial support for Altera's SOCFPGA platform. In-Reply-To: <1340999687.8634.9.camel@dinguyen-VirtualBox> References: <1340805007-3313-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <1340805007-3313-2-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <20120627162014.1494cdd7@skate> <20120627180516.GA17393@elf.ucw.cz> <20120627204018.0bfef362@skate> <1340999687.8634.9.camel@dinguyen-VirtualBox> Message-ID: <20120630001820.4b28d417@skate> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:54:47 -0500, Dinh Nguyen a ?crit : > > Hum, yes, maybe. Maybe just MACH_ALTERA, and mach-altera then? > > Hopefully others will have better ideas. > > First off, thanks for the thoughtful review, its very much appreciated. You're welcome. > Unless its a really strong objection, I'd like to stick with > mach-socfpga. This is a name that Altera has started to market this hwt > around and I would like to stick with it. I am definitely amongst the person who will take that decision, so I can't say what will happen with this choice, but feel free to push it forward, and you'll how it goes. I'll try to make a new review once a second version of your patch set will be posted. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com