From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sha@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:50:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm: imx: enable flexcan on imx25, imx35, imx53, imx6q In-Reply-To: <1341175565-13218-2-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de> References: <1341175565-13218-1-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de> <1341175565-13218-2-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20120702075054.GF2698@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:46:04PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > Cc: Sascha Hauer > Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > index eff4db5..c296851 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ config SOC_IMX25 > select ARCH_MX25 > select COMMON_CLK > select CPU_ARM926T > + select HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN if CAN Do we need the 'if CAN' here? It seems yes, since HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN is inside the "CAN Device Drivers" menu which depends on CAN. Shouldn't the HAVE_CAN_FLECAN be outside the menu? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |