From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:17:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6q-sabrelite.dts: Add watchdog support In-Reply-To: <20120703030337.GD22106@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1341258627-3469-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> <20120703030337.GD22106@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20120703101744.GW2698@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:03:39AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 04:50:26PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > From: Fabio Estevam > > > > Add watchdog support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts | 3 +++ > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts > > index e0ec929..99581a0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts > > @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ > > }; > > }; > > > > + wdog at 020bc000 { /* WDOG1 */ > > + status = "okay"; > > + }; > > I'm wondering if it makes more sense to have wdog, rtc, such completely > soc internal stuff always enabled in .dtsi. +1 for the watchdog I'm not so sure about the rtc though, since one important component of the RTC is not completely internal to the SoC: the battery. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |