From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:11:55 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCHv1 1/2] ARM: socfpga: initial support for Altera's SOCFPGA platform. In-Reply-To: <20120630001820.4b28d417@skate> References: <1340805007-3313-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <1340805007-3313-2-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <20120627162014.1494cdd7@skate> <20120627180516.GA17393@elf.ucw.cz> <20120627204018.0bfef362@skate> <1340999687.8634.9.camel@dinguyen-VirtualBox> <20120630001820.4b28d417@skate> Message-ID: <20120704181155.13fa54f6@skate> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:18:20 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit : > > Unless its a really strong objection, I'd like to stick with > > mach-socfpga. This is a name that Altera has started to market this hwt > > around and I would like to stick with it. > > I am definitely amongst the person who will take that decision, so I > can't say what will happen with this choice, but feel free to push it > forward, and you'll how it goes. Re-reading this, I did a mistake, I wanted to say: "I am definitely *not* amongst the person who will take that decision". I guess it was clear by the rest of the e-mail, but I just wanted to be sure. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com