From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 13:45:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration In-Reply-To: <4FF58B68.5000703@linaro.org> References: <20120703132447.GN29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FF2F82D.9080507@linaro.org> <20120703142123.GQ29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FF54406.3000307@linaro.org> <20120705094541.GK4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FF57EA9.7060107@linaro.org> <20120705120600.GT4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FF58571.2090807@linaro.org> <20120705122947.GY4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FF58B68.5000703@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120705124549.GD4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:41:12PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 05/07/12 13:29, Mark Brown wrote: > If DT is _not_ enabled, we do: > From platform code: > - Register the DB8500-PRCMU > - Register the AB8500 > So you see the registration is separate. Right, so what I'm saying is that what I'd expect unless there's something unusual going on is that you wouldn't be doing the separate registration of the AB8500 here and would instead be passing the platform data for the AB8500 through in the same way you pass the DT data through. DT and non-DT do have a very similar model for this stuff. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: