From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:13:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration In-Reply-To: <4FF59F5C.8050002@linaro.org> References: <20120703132447.GN29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FF58B68.5000703@linaro.org> <20120705124549.GD4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201207051357.07195.arnd@arndb.de> <4FF59F5C.8050002@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120705141329.GN4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making > >it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that > >we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the > >DT and the non-DT case. > Ah, is that what you were saying Mark? > If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform > code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for _both_ DT > and !DT. Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: