From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: richard.zhao@freescale.com (Richard Zhao)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:52:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] i2c i.MX: Fix divider table
In-Reply-To: <20120705160153.GT30009@pengutronix.de>
References: <1341493826-13861-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
 <20120705145236.GA2735@richard-laptop>
 <20120705160153.GT30009@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20120706005249.GA26888@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:01:53PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:52:39PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > Measurements on i.MX1 and i.MX53 have shown that the divider values
> > > in the datasheets are wrong. the values from first, third and fourth
> > > column were all measured to be 8 higher than in the datasheet. It
> > > should be safe to assume that the SoCs between i.MX1 and i.MX53 behave
> > > the same as the i2c unit is unchanged since the i.MX1.
> > We may need to check with IC guys? Or you've done?
> 
> I don't have contact to the IC guys. Could you do this? I'd be
> interested in the results.
Sure, but it may be slow, as you know, many people are in summer break.

Thanks
Richard
> 
> Sascha
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>