From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:05:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2 V2] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c In-Reply-To: <201207091307.35860.marex@denx.de> References: <1341554956-17416-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <20120709105338.GE1296@pengutronix.de> <201207091307.35860.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <20120709120523.GG1296@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi > > > index ee3778a..832d30a 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi > [...] > > > @@ -428,6 +429,7 @@ > > > > > > compatible = "fsl,imx28-i2c"; > > > reg = <0x8005a000 2000>; > > > interrupts = <110 69>; > > > > > > + clock-frequency = <400000>; > > > > NACK on that. Not all slaves can do 400KHz, so this is not a sensible > > default. > > How many of such chips are there and how many of the chips can do 400kHz ? I > believe the majority shouldn't suffer because of minority. The kernel should work for all users, not only for the majority, so: Better safe than sorry. Also, defaults should make the system work. Tuning can be done later by somebody who understands what is needed. And frankly, this attitude which made you add a potential regression is worrisome. I'd suggest to give stability a higher priority. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: