From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:42:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dt: tegra: seaboard: add regulators In-Reply-To: <4FFC4478.7000204@nvidia.com> References: <4FE80413.6070001@nvidia.com> <4FE87FE3.1080608@wwwdotorg.org> <4FE882A5.3080504@nvidia.com> <20120625222646.GB30406@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FE8EFC4.3090509@wwwdotorg.org> <4FFC190A.2040800@nvidia.com> <20120710134436.GD9409@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FFC31D5.7090600@nvidia.com> <20120710135302.GG9409@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FFC4478.7000204@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20120710154201.GE10022@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:34:24PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > The sample code for tps65910 is as follows. So where do you think > that it is wrong and what should be correct approach. > I need to follow the same for tps6586x also. Like I said the use of a supply name should be unconditional, you should just set the supply name in the descriptor. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: