From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:13:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 V2] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c
In-Reply-To: <20120710140911.GK20456@pengutronix.de>
References: <1341554956-17416-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
 <201207091758.22788.marex@denx.de> <20120710140911.GK20456@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <201207101713.31498.marex@denx.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear Robert Schwebel,

> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > The kernel should work for all users, not only for the majority, so:
> > > Better safe than sorry.
> > > 
> > > Also, defaults should make the system work. Tuning can be done later by
> > > somebody who understands what is needed.
> > > 
> > > And frankly, this attitude which made you add a potential regression is
> > > worrisome. I'd suggest to give stability a higher priority.
> > 
> > I believe you misunderstood my intention. Setting it to 400kHz was done
> > because it's what most people will use, therefore avoiding duplication
> > (most of the board files will override this setting now). All right,
> > your sane defaults here can be applied, I won't argue.
> 
> I think all I2C chips support 100 kHz, but only selected ones support
> 400 kHz.

Yes, this is correct. And I never argued about this.

But anyway, V3 patch is out, let's cut this discussion short.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut