linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv11 5/6] i2c: omap: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:21:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712122109.GE2194@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340896292-12112-6-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:41:31PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> 
> The OMAP3530 is based upon the same silicon as the OMAP3430 and so the I2C
> revision is the same for 3430 and 3530. However, the OMAP3630 device has the
> same I2C revision as OMAP4. Correct the revision definition to reflect this.
> 
> This patch is based on work done by Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> Changes from his patch
> - Update OMAP_I2C_REV_ON_3430 also to reflect that it is same as 3530
> 
> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>

Applied to next, thanks.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120712/3b5239b1/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-28 15:11 [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 1/6] i2c: omap: Optimise the remove code Shubhrajyoti D
2012-07-12 12:18   ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:21     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 2/6] i2c: omap: Use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS Shubhrajyoti D
2012-07-12 12:19   ` Wolfram Sang
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 3/6] i2c: omap: Do not initialise the completion everytime Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 16:03   ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-29  1:34     ` Zhang, Shijie
2012-07-12 12:19   ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:05     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 4/6] i2c: omap: Remove the definition of SYSS_RESETDONE_MASK Shubhrajyoti D
2012-07-12 12:20   ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:05     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 5/6] i2c: omap: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-07-12 12:21   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-07-13 11:04     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 6/6] i2c: omap: Recover from Bus Busy condition Shubhrajyoti D
2012-07-12 12:22   ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:04     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-07-12 12:52   ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:25     ` Shubhrajyoti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120712122109.GE2194@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).