From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:21:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv11 5/6] i2c: omap: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3 In-Reply-To: <1340896292-12112-6-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> References: <1340896292-12112-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1340896292-12112-6-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> Message-ID: <20120712122109.GE2194@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:41:31PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote: > From: Jon Hunter > > The OMAP3530 is based upon the same silicon as the OMAP3430 and so the I2C > revision is the same for 3430 and 3530. However, the OMAP3630 device has the > same I2C revision as OMAP4. Correct the revision definition to reflect this. > > This patch is based on work done by Jon Hunter > Changes from his patch > - Update OMAP_I2C_REV_ON_3430 also to reflect that it is same as 3530 > > Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D Applied to next, thanks. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: