From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Device tree binding for DVFS table
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:40:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120715214033.GK4041@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50006935.2080606@nvidia.com>
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:00:14AM +0530, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Thursday 12 July 2012 09:38 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> >About repeating frequencies, operating voltage for a frequency
> >would be the highest one mapped in the table.
This sounds very surprising... that would generally just result in
higher power consumption.
> >I know this makes reading difficult but it provides flexibility,
> Does this explanation help?
The loss of comprehensibility seems like a really major disadvantage for
very little practical gain here. Big arrays in DT are already hard
enough to read without adding extra complexity on top of that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120715/d6dbc57c/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-15 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 12:56 Device tree binding for DVFS table Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-11 14:03 ` Rob Herring
2012-07-11 14:44 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-11 20:04 ` Mike Turquette
2012-07-12 4:14 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-12 14:10 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-07-12 17:10 ` Mike Turquette
2012-07-12 17:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-13 10:34 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-07-13 17:25 ` Mike Turquette
2012-07-12 4:17 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-12 15:23 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-12 17:01 ` Mike Turquette
2012-07-12 8:19 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-07-12 4:08 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-13 18:30 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-15 21:40 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-07-15 23:42 ` Rob Herring
2012-07-16 18:36 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-07-17 12:37 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-17 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:22 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-17 14:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 12:46 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-07-18 21:19 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 17:08 ` Shawn Guo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-11 13:08 함명주
2012-07-11 13:49 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-07-11 13:49 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-07-12 4:22 ` Prashant Gaikwad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120715214033.GK4041@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).