From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:40:34 +0100 Subject: Device tree binding for DVFS table In-Reply-To: <50006935.2080606@nvidia.com> References: <4FFD77FE.8050206@nvidia.com> <4FFD87BD.2030206@gmail.com> <4FFE4DD0.7020407@nvidia.com> <50006935.2080606@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20120715214033.GK4041@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:00:14AM +0530, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: > On Thursday 12 July 2012 09:38 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: > >About repeating frequencies, operating voltage for a frequency > >would be the highest one mapped in the table. This sounds very surprising... that would generally just result in higher power consumption. > >I know this makes reading difficult but it provides flexibility, > Does this explanation help? The loss of comprehensibility seems like a really major disadvantage for very little practical gain here. Big arrays in DT are already hard enough to read without adding extra complexity on top of that. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: