From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:33:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120718103311.GG22739@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50069006.8050301@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote:
> >It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here,
> >it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated.
> What's the difference?
> >+- db8500.dtsi // silicon
> >\
> > +-- snowball.dts // board
I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks. Now think how
that's working for people when they put the configuration for the
silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120718/7dd4a279/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-10 6:41 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 8:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-13 11:03 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-14 21:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 10:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 11:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 13:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 13:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:02 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:52 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 5:33 ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 10:33 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-07-18 10:43 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 7:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 11:24 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 11:37 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 12:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 19:45 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 20:04 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-17 13:10 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-19 5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 7:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-11-15 5:27 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120718103311.GG22739@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).