From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:33:12 +0100 Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree In-Reply-To: <50069006.8050301@linaro.org> References: <20120717130650.GB27595@sirena.org.uk> <500568D9.10805@linaro.org> <20120717133550.GC4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50057058.2060002@linaro.org> <20120717142222.GE4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50057C1A.80606@linaro.org> <20120717152001.GF4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120718053341.GA4009@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20120718095937.GB22739@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50069006.8050301@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120718103311.GG22739@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote: > >It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here, > >it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated. > What's the difference? > >+- db8500.dtsi // silicon > >\ > > +-- snowball.dts // board I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks. Now think how that's working for people when they put the configuration for the silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: