From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] IIO: Add basic MXS LRADC driver
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:12:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207201712.52745.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50096723.2070409@metafoo.de>
Dear Lars-Peter Clausen,
> On 07/19/2012 09:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Lars-Peter Clausen,
> >
> >> On 07/19/2012 04:23 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Dear Lars-Peter Clausen,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for my late reply, got busy with other crazy stuff.
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>>>>> Is there any reason not to use the mxs_lradc struct directly has the
> >>>>>> iio data?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I explained it below in the patch. I hope we'll eventually support
> >>>>> the delay triggers, which will need 4 separate IIO devices. And this
> >>>>> is where this structure will be augmented by other components.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok I saw the comment, but it wasn't obvious to me that delay channels
> >>>> will require multiple IIO devices. Might make sense to state this
> >>>> explicitly.
> >>>
> >>> Fixed.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * Channel management
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * This involves crazy mapping between 8 virtual channels the
> >>>>>>> CTRL4 register + * can harbor and 16 channels total this hardware
> >>>>>>> supports. + */
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I suppose this means only a maximum 8 channels can be active at a
> >>>>>> time. I've recently posted a patch which makes it easy to implement
> >>>>>> such a restriction.
> >>>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-iio/msg05936.html and
> >>>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-iio/msg05935.html for an example
> >>>>>> validate callback implementation. In your case you'd check for
> >>>>>> bitmap_weight(...) <= 8. Those patches are not yet in IIO though.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is good. When do you expect this to hit linux-next possibly? Or
> >>>>> at least linux-iio?
> >>>>
> >>>> soon, hopefully.
> >>>
> >>> So I checked this, not sure how it'll help me though.
> >>
> >> Right now with your driver you can enable any combination of channels.
> >> If more than 8 channels are enabled and you start sampling it will
> >> fail, since not all channels can be mapped. With those patch you can
> >> implement a validate callback and check for bitmap_weight(scan_mask) <=
> >> 8. This will ensure that it is not possible to select more than 8
> >> channels at once, which again means that starting sampling can't fail
> >> of this.
> >
> > Ok, I fixed this one. One last thing that I don't really understand is
> > this. I run generic_buffer.c to source samples from the LRADC. Is there
> > any way to continuously sample them? Because right now, I get one sample
> > and that's it, no more samples happen later on (I can 0 data in
> > subsequent read() call).
>
> I'd consider that a bug in your driver ;)
> The intend with IIO is that once you start sampling by enabling the buffer
> you get a continuous data stream until sampling is stopped and this works
> fine with other drivers.
Ah! Thanks, I'll poke into this.
> - Lars
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 2:15 [PATCH] IIO: Add basic MXS LRADC driver Marek Vasut
2012-07-04 4:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-07-04 8:35 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-04 23:48 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-05 8:33 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-05 19:53 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-19 14:23 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-19 14:33 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-19 15:15 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-19 19:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-20 2:18 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-20 8:39 ` Robert Schwebel
2012-07-20 11:32 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-20 14:09 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-22 19:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-07-20 14:11 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-20 15:12 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-07-09 9:19 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-07-09 9:52 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-09 10:03 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-10 9:20 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-07-10 9:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-10 9:49 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-07-10 10:08 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-10 10:26 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-07-10 10:35 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-10 10:41 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-07-10 10:45 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207201712.52745.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).