From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:23:36 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/16] SPI: Refactor spi-orion to use SPI framework queue. In-Reply-To: <20120723101641.GD18778@lunn.ch> References: <1342805751-18048-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1342805751-18048-3-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <20120722095328.GB5423@lunn.ch> <20120722190700.GD4557@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120722193243.GF5423@lunn.ch> <20120722224241.GH4557@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120723072749.GA18778@lunn.ch> <20120723093747.GD4435@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120723101641.GD18778@lunn.ch> Message-ID: <20120723102336.GH4435@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:16:41PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:37:47AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > The bit I was saying was most low risk was the actual DT changes, as > > opposed to the bits that parse and use the DT. > Ah, O.K. I understood you wrongly. I actually think they are the most > dangerous part. A board booting with these DT changes, and without the > driver enablement for DT is likely to fail to find its root > filesystem. Why would that be? If there's no DT support for the driver it'll just ignore the DT. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: