From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:45:41 +0100 Subject: rmk back but still recovering (was Re: Reminder - rmk still on vacation) In-Reply-To: References: <20120725141222.GA6939@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120727134231.GA5934@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120727165049.GB7405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20120730144541.GH7405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:40:27AM +0200, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > IMHO, we should merge the OMAP DMA engine support which is now sufficiently > tested and has been in linux-next for some time. Polling mode and ASOC > related issues can be then debugged directly on mainline. > For the time being, the SOC patch which Tony merged in linux-omap > master can be included along with rest of the OMAP DMA engine patches > to have working kernel. BTW, I was referring to the copyright issues which you apparantly raised while I was away. I assume you've dropped those objections now.