From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:08:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all
 subsequent widgets to fail too
In-Reply-To: <50193428.5000708@linaro.org>
References: <20120731134214.GK4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <5017EAC3.3080504@linaro.org>
 <20120731142820.GW4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <5017EDCA.4020601@linaro.org>
 <20120731145443.GY4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <5017F68B.3060400@linaro.org>
 <20120731151819.GC4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <5018D880.5090306@linaro.org>
 <20120801132022.GS11892@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <50193428.5000708@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20120801160824.GB11892@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:50:32PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> I am under the impression that it was tested. Perhaps before it was
> rebased, but tests were completed. Ola was very surprised when I
> told him there were link failures. The only issue is that I only
> found out and told him a day before he was due to take his Summer
> leave.

That's really surprising.  What are the actual issues here, you've never
shown the actual errors?

> >It's very disappointing to see such an error exist, and even more
> >disappointing that there's no interest in fixing the driver.

> This is incorrect. I'm sure the driver will be fixed post-haste when
> Ola returns back from vacation. If I can find some time I might
> dabble in the mean-time also.

It may not be what you're intending but it's unfortuantely what's I'm
seeing.