From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@avionic-design.de (Thierry Reding) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 07:58:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 12/32] PCI/ARM: use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify implementation In-Reply-To: <5019654D.2000408@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1343836477-7287-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <1343836477-7287-13-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <5019654D.2000408@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120802055839.GA12241@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:20:13AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/01/2012 09:54 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: > > From: Jiang Liu > > > > Use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify PCIe ARM implementation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu > > This is probably fine from my perspective assuming the underlying PCI > API implementation is OKd by relevant people. > > Thierry, can you comment on whether this will conflict with your Tegra > PCIe driver series? If it doesn't, this patch can go through any > relevant PCI tree. If it does, we may have to take this through the > Tegra tree after merging the dependencies, or defer it to later. I haven't touched those lines. tegra_pcie_relax_enable() only uses generic PCI functions so I don't expect any conflicts. git blame confirms that those lines haven't been changed in about 2 years. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: