linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: makefile: work around toolchain bug in recent versions of binutils
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:51:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802155140.GF9838@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120802153030.GV6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:30:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:04:11PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > Maybe this needs to be a build-time test whether the assembler accepts it?
> > 
> > That could be tricky since gas still accepts the option, but fails later
> > with:
> > 
> > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does not support requested special purpose register -- `mrs r2,cpsr'
> > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:134: Error: selected processor does not support requested special purpose register -- `mrs r2,cpsr'
> > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:136: Error: selected processor does not support requested special purpose register -- `msr cpsr_c,r2'
> > 
> > How about grabbing the march from KBUILD_AFLAGS instead (see below)?
> 
> It might just be easier to specify something like -march=armv4 or
> something like that, and then use .arch armv6 where required.

We could do that, but I worry that it will become very messy if/when people
start adding things like virtualisation instructions (hvc and co) to the
entry code. Using the same march flag for kernel and decompressor also keeps
everything consistent.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-02 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-02 12:23 [PATCH] ARM: makefile: work around toolchain bug in recent versions of binutils Will Deacon
2012-08-02 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-02 15:01   ` Will Deacon
2012-08-02 15:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-02 15:51       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-08-02 18:18         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-02 18:50           ` Will Deacon
2012-08-02 19:09             ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2012-08-02 19:44             ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120802155140.GF9838@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).