From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] arm: add documentation describing Marvell families of SoC
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 22:59:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120804225938.6d44a9af@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMPhdO8jiTwfdk0DkhjdwMbH3Mt6=XXZKhwNH412UfNbodu7Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Eric,
Thanks for all those details! Some comments below.
Le Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:01:51 +0800,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> a ?crit :
> This is so useful to Marvell processor new comers, thanks everyone to
> compile this.
>
> The PXA side might need a bit modification though, so for historical
> reason there is PXA series as originated back from Intel. So there
> are really those legacy ones:
>
> PXA21x/PXA25x/PXA27x/PXA3xx/PXA93x
>
> The new ones developed after Marvell acquired Intel's XScale biz are:
>
> PXA95x/PXA168/PXA910/MMP2
>
> And among these, they are actually categorized into two flavors:
>
> AP with CP: PXA93x/PXA95X/PXA910
> AP only without CP: the rest of them
>
> And the ARM cores used are also a bit different:
>
> XScale (Intel's ARMv5te compatible):
> PXA21x/PXA25x/PXA27x/PXA3xx/PXA93x Marvell's PJ1 (Marvell's ARMv5te
> compatible): PXA168/PXA910 Marvell's PJ4 (Marvell's ARMv7
> compatible): PXA95x/MMP2
Great, I included all those informations in some form. Will be part of
v3.
> So these are really a bit complicated, by the end of the day, we
> would still go the way as Arnd suggested, that to collapse PXA and
> MMP series into one, so that will be simpler and easier to understand.
>
> Considering the complications here, I would suggest to simply have a
> single processor line as: PXA/MMP processor line, and list all the
> processor flavors under, whether it's an AP or a AP+CP could be
> individually indicated.
For now, I prefer to keep those as two separate families, so that it
reflects the *current* state of the Linux mach-* directories. The
current state may not be perfect, but it's the current state, so let's
reflect it for now.
Thanks again for your comments!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-04 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-17 14:26 [PATCH] [RFC] arm: add documentation describing Marvell families of SoC Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-17 14:59 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-17 15:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-17 15:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-17 15:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-17 16:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-17 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-07-17 18:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-08-04 21:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-17 15:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-17 18:01 ` [PATCH] " Eric Miao
2012-07-17 18:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-17 18:08 ` Eric Miao
2012-07-17 18:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-17 18:50 ` Eric Miao
2012-08-04 20:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120804225938.6d44a9af@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).