From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:40:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120813104006.GA20537@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVMg5Acx4_KGT5jn1JgO3JsXAjZzU8virR=B3+pBrT4o_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:09:51PM +0100, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pmu_device->dev);
>
> One question, each pmu is just inside one cpu core and should be
> suspended individually, but looks the above don't support it, do it?
I'll let Jon elaborate, but I'm not sure that suspending the individual PMUs
makes much sense if one of them is being used (other than taking the whole
CPU offline). Given that tasks can migrate and perf-events can be across
multiple CPUs, it makes it a lot easier to treat them as a single entity. It
also allows us to implement mutual exclusion using the same hooks and to
manage any common IP (e.g. CTI) at the same time, without having to keep
track of things like the last man standing.
So, unless Jon has some ideas here, it's not something that I consider to be
a real problem.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-13 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-10 17:36 [PATCH 0/9] ARM perf updates for 3.7 Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support Will Deacon
2012-08-11 15:09 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-13 10:40 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-08-16 13:56 ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: perf: add devicetree bindings for 11MPcore, A5, A7 and A15 PMUs Will Deacon
2012-08-10 18:42 ` Rob Herring
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: pmu: remove unused reservation mechanism Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: pmu: remove arm_pmu_type enumeration Will Deacon
2012-08-13 14:17 ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-13 21:57 ` Jiandong Zheng
2012-08-14 8:43 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2012-08-14 16:53 ` Jiandong Zheng
2012-08-16 13:59 ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-17 14:08 ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-20 9:01 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-20 13:05 ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-23 5:45 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: perf: remove mysterious compiler barrier Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: perf: probe devicetree in preference to current CPU Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: perf: prepare for moving CPU PMU code into separate file Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: perf: move CPU-specific PMU handling " Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: perf: move irq registration into pmu implementation Will Deacon
2012-08-13 9:11 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM perf updates for 3.7 Hui Wang
2012-08-13 9:32 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-14 1:46 ` Hui Wang
2013-02-28 6:54 ` i.MX6Quad PMU irq handling (was: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM perf updates for 3.7) Dirk Behme
2013-02-28 7:27 ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-28 7:38 ` i.MX6Quad PMU irq handling Hui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120813104006.GA20537@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).