From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:29:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Provide the PRCMU with its own IRQ domain In-Reply-To: <20120820125531.GA20242@gmail.com> References: <1344527635-6163-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1344527635-6163-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <201208140942.54773.arnd@arndb.de> <20120820083640.GH8450@gmail.com> <20120820121055.GA26991@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120820125531.GA20242@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20120820162923.GF26991@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:55:32PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > Right, that was the initial intention. It would be a trivial semantic > change if drivers without DT support wished to use the functionality > though. However, the only examples I found of a non-DT enabled driver > that could make good use of it in order to strip out some cruft would > be the Arizona and one of the Samsung drivers, and they each have All of the regmap devices could use this. > their own hand-rolled methods of hwirq -> virq conversion now, so any > change to support them would result in multiple invocations of > irq_create_mapping which would likely cause breakage. Multiple calls to irq_create_mapping() are totally fine. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: