From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:52:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Provide the PRCMU with its own IRQ domain In-Reply-To: <20120821120243.GF26899@gmail.com> References: <20120820121055.GA26991@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120820125531.GA20242@gmail.com> <20120820162923.GF26991@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120820164949.GB22749@gmail.com> <20120820175155.GH26991@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120821085618.GA26899@gmail.com> <20120821095026.GU26991@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120821105413.GD26899@gmail.com> <20120821110329.GA7995@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120821120243.GF26899@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20120821165207.GX7995@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:02:46PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > another way to get hold of the domain, because the only way to obtain > > > it without having direct access is via a device node. > > This doesn't actually hold. > Okay, besides irq_find_host(struct device_node *np), how else can you fetch > a domain from the irqdomain? I'm not sure I can parse the above, sorry - I'm not sure I can distinguish "domain" and "irqdomain". > What have you done already? Implemented a patch for this which I've now tested a bit and will probably post in the next hour or so. > Why make suggestions if you're just going to do the work yourself? I made the suggestion then later on realised that this was actively going to break things I care about so I actually need it fixing. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: