FW: [PATCH V5 0/5] clk: mmp: add clock framework for mmp

FW: [PATCH V5 0/5] clk: mmp: add clock framework for mmp

[Chao Xie]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:39 PM
> To: Chao Xie
> Cc: haojian.zhuang at gmail.com; mturquette at linaro.org; viresh.linux at gmail.com; s.hauer at pengutronix.de; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Chao Xie
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] clk: mmp: add clock framework for mmp
>
> On Monday 20 August 2012, Chao Xie wrote:
>>
>> From: Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> replace __raw_xxx with xxx_relax
>> use ioremap to remap the registers. Finaly it will use device tree to
>> get the physical address.
>> do not use macro to register clocks, and directly call the functions.
>>
>> v2->v3:
>> pxa910 will have APB extension clock, so some peripharals will have
>> clocks in APB extension base.
>> change pxa168-pwm to be pxa910-pwm for pxa910. It will fit the current
>> pwm driver.
>>
>> v3->v4:
>> remove addtional clock name definition
>> replace left __raw_xxx
>>
>> v4->v5:
>> change the format of the file
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
>         Arnd

Who will be responsible for merging these patches?

FW: [PATCH V5 0/5] clk: mmp: add clock framework for mmp

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 22 August 2012, Chao Xie wrote:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> >         Arnd
> 
> Who will be responsible for merging these patches?
> 

They should go through Mike's tree, unless there is a reason why he
prefers them to go through arm-soc. It would be helpful to add
an 'Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>' line
and my 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>' line to each
patch for that.

	Arnd

FW: [PATCH V5 0/5] clk: mmp: add clock framework for mmp

[Haojian Zhuang]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 August 2012, Chao Xie wrote:
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> >
>> >         Arnd
>>
>> Who will be responsible for merging these patches?
>>
>
> They should go through Mike's tree, unless there is a reason why he
> prefers them to go through arm-soc. It would be helpful to add
> an 'Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>' line
> and my 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>' line to each
> patch for that.
>
>         Arnd

I'm OK on these patches.

Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>

Regards
Haojian

FW: [PATCH V5 0/5] clk: mmp: add clock framework for mmp

[Chao Xie]

hi, Mike
Can you help to review and merge these patches?

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Haojian Zhuang
<haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 22 August 2012, Chao Xie wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> >
>>> >         Arnd
>>>
>>> Who will be responsible for merging these patches?
>>>
>>
>> They should go through Mike's tree, unless there is a reason why he
>> prefers them to go through arm-soc. It would be helpful to add
>> an 'Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>' line
>> and my 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>' line to each
>> patch for that.
>>
>>         Arnd
>
> I'm OK on these patches.
>
> Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
>
> Regards
> Haojian