From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:58:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: Davinci: pcm: Add device tree bindings In-Reply-To: <1BAFE6F6C881BF42822005164F1491C33EA67DA1@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> References: <1344948125-5649-1-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <1344948125-5649-4-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <20120817223122.GA21445@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1BAFE6F6C881BF42822005164F1491C33EA67DA1@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <20120822155808.GP7995@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:50:09PM +0000, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > From your for-3.7 branch, I could only find such implementation in Tegra > Platform. > Most Freescale platforms implements this through a device/driver method. > Exception being sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c > So should I follow tegra implementation? Tegra and mxs should be good examples, yes. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: