From: minchan@kernel.org (Minchan Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 2/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU allocates pages from pool with GFP_ATOMIC
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:49:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823034935.GC5369@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120822.163648.3800987367886904.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com> wrote @ Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:47:00 +0200:
>
> > vzalloc() call in __iommu_alloc_buffer() also causes BUG() in atomic context.
>
> Right.
>
> I've been thinking that kzalloc() may be enough here, since
> vzalloc() was introduced to avoid allocation failure for big chunk of
> memory, but I think that it's unlikely that the number of page array
> can be so big. So I propose to drop vzalloc() here, and just simply to
> use kzalloc only as below(*1).
>
> For example,
>
> 1920(H) x 1080(W) x 4(bytes) ~= 8MiB
>
> For 8 MiB buffer,
> 8(MiB) * 1024 = 8192(KiB)
> 8192(KiB) / 4(KiB/page) = 2048 pages
> sizeof(struct page *) = 4 bytes
> 2048(pages) * 4(bytes/page) = 8192(bytes) = 8(KiB)
> 8(KiB) / 4(KiB/page) = 2 pages
>
> If the above estimation is right(I hope;)), the necessary pages are
> _at most_ 2 pages. If the system gets into the situation to fail to
> allocate 2 contiguous pages, that's real the problem. I guess that
> that kind of fragmentation problem would be solved with page migration
> or something, especially nowadays devices are getting larger memories.
In atomic context, VM have no choice except relying on kswapd so
high order allocation can fail easily when memory fragementation
is high.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 10:20 [RFC 0/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU atomic allocation Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-22 10:20 ` [RFC 1/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Refactor out to introduce __alloc_fill_pages Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-22 10:20 ` [RFC 2/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU allocates pages from pool with GFP_ATOMIC Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-22 12:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-08-22 12:52 ` Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-22 12:47 ` KyongHo Cho
2012-08-22 13:36 ` Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-23 3:49 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-08-23 3:57 ` KyongHo Cho
2012-08-23 5:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-08-23 6:15 ` Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-23 7:52 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-08-22 10:20 ` [RFC 3/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Return cpu addr when dma_alloc(GFP_ATOMIC) Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-22 10:21 ` [RFC 4/4] ARM: dma-mapping: dma_{alloc, free}_coherent with empty attrs Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-22 12:04 ` [RFC 0/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU atomic allocation Marek Szyprowski
2012-08-22 14:44 ` Hiroshi Doyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120823034935.GC5369@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).