linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: move ARCH config definitions into mach dirs
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:45:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120830164551.GY18957@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503F845C.10406@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:18:52AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Then what do you suggest? I can think of a few alternatives.
> 
> Leave the current name and make the hidden option a new name like
> ARCH_xx_OPTIONS. This would require renaming ARCH_xxx for each platform
> all over the tree. I don't care to sign up for that task...

Well, requiring everyone to spend hours redoing their configuration also
isn't practical either.

> Move platforms one by one out of the choice as they are converted. I
> can't think of a reason for a platform to be in both places except we
> would have to figure out something for getting DEBUG_LL to work.

No you don't.  We've already decided how we're going to deal with
DEBUG_LL, and we are _not_ going to make that multi-platform.  You
select one of the output options, and that is it.  We've already
been moving in that direction, albiet slowly.  Again, anyone who wants
to be part of a multiplatform kernel better use the provided choice
or they will get no DEBUG_LL facility - simples.

That also means we can start to think about moving the mach/debug-macros.S
header elsewhere, remembering that this facility is shared between the
decompressor for debugging and the kernel.

Remember that DEBUG_LL is the low-level *debug* facility.  It is not
the early console, even if it ended up being used as such (which is
not something I really care for.)  Read the previous discussions on
this subject if you disagree, but I'm not changing my position over
DEBUG_LL because that will just require me to re-invent the facility
yet again (which is what DEBUG_LL is there to stop.)  It was _never_
intended to be an early console facility.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-30 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-29 22:49 [PATCH 0/6] Initial multi-platform support Rob Herring
2012-08-29 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: move ARCH config definitions into mach dirs Rob Herring
2012-08-29 23:14   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-08-29 23:31   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-30 15:18     ` Rob Herring
2012-08-30 16:45       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-08-30 19:07         ` Rob Herring
2012-08-30 19:28           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-31 11:05             ` Domenico Andreoli
2012-08-31 11:11               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-31 11:46                 ` Domenico Andreoli
2012-09-01  0:48             ` Rob Herring
2012-09-02  8:49               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-04 17:50                 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-08-29 22:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: introduce Kconfig.mach Rob Herring
2012-08-29 23:18   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-08-29 22:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: picoxcell: header fixes for multi-platform Rob Herring
2012-08-29 22:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: vexpress: remove dependency on mach/* headers Rob Herring
2012-08-29 22:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: initial multiplatform support Rob Herring
2012-08-29 22:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: update defconfigs Rob Herring
2012-08-31 18:12 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: initial multiplatform support Rob Herring
2012-09-03 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-03 21:58     ` Rob Herring
2012-09-04  6:56       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-04 22:40         ` Rob Herring
2012-09-05 10:36           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-05 13:25             ` Rob Herring
2012-09-05 13:33               ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120830164551.GY18957@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).