From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] ARM i.MX53: Add pwms to dtsi
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:16:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120831001604.GG3613@r65073-Latitude-D630> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120831130723.GS26594@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:07:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi1_ipg_gate], NULL, "63fcc000.ssi");
> > > clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi2_ipg_gate], NULL, "50014000.ssi");
> > > clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi3_ipg_gate], NULL, "63fd0000.ssi");
> > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm1_ipg_gate], "ipg", "53fb4000.pwm");
> > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm1_hf_gate], "per", "53fb4000.pwm");
> > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm2_ipg_gate], "ipg", "53fb8000.pwm");
> > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm2_hf_gate], "per", "53fb8000.pwm");
> >
> > It should be in a separate patch?
>
> Should it? Surely I can do this, I had the feeling though that it
> belongs together.
>
>From patch subject, I do not expect these changes in the patch. It's
okay to have it but we need a more proper patch subject then.
--
Regards,
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-31 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 11:48 i.MX pwm patches Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] pwm i.MX: factor out SoC specific functions Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] pwm i.MX: remove unnecessary if in pwm_[en|dis]able Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] pwm i.MX: add functions to enable/disable pwm Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] pwm i.MX: Use module_platform_driver Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:26 ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] pwm i.MX: use per clock unconditionally Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] pwm i.MX: fix clock lookup Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM i.MX53: Add pwms to dtsi Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:32 ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-31 13:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-31 0:16 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2012-09-07 13:29 ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-07 17:26 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 20:10 ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:28 ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-30 21:45 ` i.MX pwm patches Shawn Guo
2012-08-31 13:05 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120831001604.GG3613@r65073-Latitude-D630 \
--to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox